vxbush 7/10/2026 8:11:26 AM

1

Chocolate breakfast? Yes, please. I'll take the right plate.

Things are getting interesting in Provo, Utah, with the accused killer of Charlie Kirk, Tyler Robinson. This was a preliminarily hearing where the court was discussing the 1102 file. That file apparently consists of interviews with Robinson's boyfriend, Lance Twiggs, that the prosecuting attorney wants to reveal. The lawyers for Twiggs and Robinson are requesting that less information be revealed in the hearing, so they are apparently confirming which information will be revealed to the court. But the lawyer for the Kirk family asked the court for full transparency, within the hearing itself. He said, "To not be transparent here, to not be open, to not let the world see what happened will create doubt and distrust in the judicial system, and that's not what anybody wants... ." Defense is claiming that Twiggs made statements about what Robinson told him, and thus they are arguing it compromised the accused's due process rights. 

I'm SOOO not a lawyer. But if the police used evidence to bring the charges against the accused, I'm trying to understand when such evidence can be blocked from the trial. Is it because they will claim it is hearsay? OR, if you're here, help me understand the limits that such a defense attorney can take. There's one more line in the article that seems relevant: "The judge redacted some of the comments from the hearing, but the prosecution told the judge they plan to undergird Twiggs' statements with screenshots of text messages, the Discord chat they used, and a note that was characterized in court as a confession." If you're quoting from text messages, that doesn't seem to be equivalent to hearsay. 

vxbush 7/10/2026 8:13:50 AM

2

Ilhan Omar’s 30 Million Dollars Have Vanished Into Thin Air, and She Doesn’t Want to Talk About It

Color me veeeeerrrry suspicious of this.

vxbush 7/10/2026 8:17:38 AM

3

This looks like a cool story. These YouTubers Helped Bring Down a $65 Million Multinational Fraud Ring – And We Should Commend Them. Great one liner within the story: "I think U.S. Attorney Adam Gordon said it best back in August 2025: 'Not all heroes wear capes. Some have YouTube channels.' "

JCM 7/10/2026 9:09:07 AM

4

Reply to vxbush in 2:

Millions disappear all the time! Nothing to see here move along.

JCM 7/10/2026 9:11:11 AM

5

Reply to vxbush in 1:

Defenses always ask to suppress evidence. This is just high profile.

Nick-Hidden 7/10/2026 10:20:11 AM

6

I was on LGF, then CorrComm for a few years.  I'm not using that nick because if buzzsawmalarky finds out who I am, I'll be in physical danger.

Knowing him, and others who've known him over the past 30 years, I can say that he became what's been called 'a child of the Web' - emotion-driven, self-inflated, incredibly self-justifying.  That's solidified as he's reached late middle-age.  He's like fellow-New Yorker Donald Trump, having never felt a need to ask for forgiveness.  Yes, he's talented, but he's also a bald-faced liar, using his legal profession skills to avoid getting nailed for the latter.

(George Soros has admitted to having something of a "god-complex".  Someone I know, who's known buzz for quite a while, thinks buzz does too.)

I VERY seriously suggest to pre-Boomer, leave that clown alone.  He's so egotistical, he's not worth it.  I know people in the City who've backed away from him over the past 20 years.

He's not evil  It's just that at times he gets so self-aroused, he becomes dirt-stupid.

(The "Register" software might have been able to get the ISP from whence this is coming, but I'm on a temp job, staying in a hotel, flying home this afternoon, so neither you nor buzz will have a clue as to where I live.)

Goodbye.  I'm gone.  I'll NEVER come back.