vxbush 6/15/2026 8:20:29 AM

1

vxbush 6/15/2026 8:22:14 AM

2

Buh-bye to Niño Guerrero. 

Now: how many more people in the leadership tree need to be eliminated before they start to understand?

vxbush 6/15/2026 8:23:33 AM

3

vxbush 6/15/2026 8:26:08 AM

4

Ah, Democrat federal judges. You'll find any excuse to get rid of a lawsuit against your friends. 

A federal judge handed ActBlue a get-out-of-jail-free card on Thursday, blocking Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton from pursuing a lawsuit against the Democrat fundraising platform. District Judge Richard Stearns decided the lawsuit was political. Specifically, Stearns concluded Paxton filed it to retaliate against ActBlue for raising money for his U.S. Senate opponent, James Talarico.

Stearns wrote in his decision, "The lawsuit in Texas is undoubtedly an adverse action. And having previously found bad faith, the court agrees with ActBlue that the evidence in the record compels the conclusion that, far from protecting Texas consumers, the action was filed in retaliation for ActBlue's fundraising on behalf of Talarico, Paxton's current political rival for the Senate seat."

There's just one problem with that claim.

Paxton's investigation into ActBlue started in Dec. 2023. Talarico didn't enter the Senate race until Sept. 2025. That's nearly two years before the "political rival" Stearns claims Paxton was targeting even announced a candidacy. And the judge knows this, because his own ruling says so.

Kosh's Shadow 6/15/2026 9:40:04 AM

5

Meanwhile, Iran has made a hudna. Once they rebuild enough, the war starts again.

I would not be surprised if some of the unfrozen Iranian money goes to Pakistan to buy some nukes once the blockade of Iran is ended.

vxbush 6/15/2026 9:54:25 AM

6

In #5 Kosh's Shadow said: I would not be surprised if some of the unfrozen Iranian money goes to Pakistan to buy some nukes once the blockade of Iran is ended.

Would Pakistan happily take that money? I'm guessing yes, and I'm wondering how we can prevent such allies from funding the Iranian insanity.

buzzsawmonkey 6/15/2026 10:41:18 AM

7

Something to keep in mind for "Pride Month":

I've been watching people get their panties in a twist for years over the "rainbow flag," when they should have spent their time laughing at it. There are so many reasons to do so:

1) "All the colors of the rainbow" has long been a way of being all-inclusive, and the flag is supposed to represent the all-inclusive "rainbow" of racial, ethnic, and sexual-orientation variety in the gay-rights movement. But the flag, from the first, is not and has never been a true "rainbow." A true rainbow has seven stripes; red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, and violet---but the "pride flag" rainbow has only six.

2) Lacking the proper stripes, the "pride flag" rainbow has been a fraud from the beginning---but then the movement itself made the flag even more fraudulent, by adding additional stripes and colors which have been inserted into a triangular field. First they added black and brown (and a little while later, grudgingly, white), to include the races which the allegedly all-inclusive "rainbow" somehow did not already include.

3) Not satisfied with these additional inclusions, the movement went further, and added pale blue and pink to encompass the "transgenders"---and, in doing so, merely reaffirmed the recognition that, in fact, the very differences between the sexes which the transgender movement resolutely denies exist.

Being outraged over "pride flags" is precisely the opposite of an appropriate response---the flag should be pointed out for what it truly is, i.e., a perfect example of the ever-expanding sectarian divisiveness which is the hallmark of the Left.